Intellectual Property

Discuss how you would rule if you were the judge in this case.

  • Did Mr. Higgins infringe on Ms. Garner’s Patent?
  • Is Ms. Garner’s patent valid?
  • Does Ms. Garner’s patent meet the requirements of being novel, non-obvious, and having utility? Explain why or why not.

Your initial response should be a minimum of 200 words.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *