A manufacturer is considering two investment programs to supply a new laptop. Market research anticipates rapid market growth: sales are expected to be 300, 000 the first year, 600,000 the second, and 900,000 the third. However, the company recognizes that actual sales may differ by plus or minus 50%.

The company has two plans to produce 900,000 units:

· Plan A: Build a single plant that could produce 900,000 units. Construction would cost $900 million and be finished in a year. The company would net $2,000 per computer sold, and the incremental manufacturing costs beyond the capital cost of the plant is expected to be $1,280 per computer.

· Plan B: Build three 300,000-unit plants, one each year, to match expected annual demand. The capital expenditure for each small plant is $300 million. The smaller plant has a unit manufacturing cost of $1,500. This plan gives the company the flexibility not to build successive plants if the demand falls short in the first or second year.

Note that both plans have drawbacks:

· Plan A involves a large amount of excess capacity in the first two years until market demand grows; and there is always a chance that demand falls short of expectations. Thus, the demand in year 3 might be as high as 1.35 million or as low as 450 thousand units.

· Plan B is less efficient. Also, if the demand grows faster than expected, it cannot take advantage of it.

The CFO asks you to prepare spreadsheets to analyze this decision. As the company will want to carry out extensive sensitivity analyses on the spreadsheet, all the input variables must be set in an input sheet, so that the rest of the spreadsheet will be an automated black-box that generates the required results.


Part 1: Based on the forecast demand expectation without variability, set up a spreadsheet to calculate the net present values (NPVs) for Plan A, and Plan B with an inflexible expansion plan (build one plant each year regardless of market demand). Based on this first analysis, which plan is better? See end of exercise for assumptions you should use for the NPV analysis.

Part 2: Now consider the effect of uncertainty in discount rate for small and big plant. Use “Data Table” in What-if Analysis to estimate profitability of plan A over plan B in a one-way (only change discount rate of one plant at a time) and two-way (change discount rate of both plants simultaneously). Draw a chart to illustrate the changes. Also use “Conditional Formatting” to color code when the sign of the difference of profitability of plans changes.

Part 3: Now consider the effect of uncertainty for variable costs of both plants and run another two-way sensitivity analysis using “Data Table” function. Draw a chart to illustrate the changes. Also use “Conditional Formatting” to color code when the sign of the difference of profitability of plans changes.

Part 4: Now consider the effect of uncertain market demand. Assuming that the market forecast is evenly distributed over the range, simulate the performance of Plan A, and Plan B without the flexibility. Use a two-way sensitivity analysis for 1st year demand vs 2nd years demand and another two-way sensitivity analysis for 2nd year demand vs 3rd year demand using “Data Table” function.

Note: In future assignments, I will ask you to conduct more sophisticated analysis on this same problem.

Assumptions for NPV analysis:

· Use a discount rate of 9% for Plan A, and 8% for Plan B.

· No salvage value for Plan A at year 3. Salvage value for Plan B is $300 million at year 3.

· No corporate overhead or selling costs allocated to the projects.

· For simplicity, assume that a new laptop line will replace the product in the 4th year so that there will be no sales in year 4 and beyond.


  • attachment


0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *